lesnodevelopment.blogg.se

Rome total war vs medieval 2 total war
Rome total war vs medieval 2 total war













rome total war vs medieval 2 total war

It's also not very historically accurate - places like Asia Minor, Mesopotamia, Northern Coast of Africa were fairly densely populated compared to a lot of places like Northern Europe. If we connected all these isolated settlements into bigger areas of activity, it would lead to a lot of new fun. People often want to extend the map, but one third of it is currently so sparsely settled hardly anything ever happens there.

rome total war vs medieval 2 total war

This annoys me mostly as a gameplay problem. Do you remember having any epic battles over Stockholm, Caffa, Tbilisi, or Algiers in any of your campaign? No way! But I bet most of you can easily recall some great battles over places like Paris, Venice, Antioch, and Jerusalem, or even smaller but well connected places like Bruges, Florence, Zagreb, and Acre see far more action.

rome total war vs medieval 2 total war

Sparsely settled places like Scandinavia, Black Sea coast, Caucasus, Mesopotamia - all suffer from the same fate of nothing ever happening there. They never take part in any action, and neither does Jedda or Dongola which are simply part of a final cleanup after Egyptians have been defeated. So they become colonized by Italians in every single game I played.Īnd remote places like Timbuktu, Arguin? It takes so ridiculously long to go there, that you're better off sending just your general and recruiting all infantry on site. You know how Islam ruled the entire African coast, from Morocco to Egypt? That never happens in Medieval 2 since neither Moors nor Egyptians have any way to reach Tripoli or Tunis in reasonable time - or to even reinforce Algiers for that matter. Every single settlement in Africa is so far from all other settlements it could as well be an island. Outside of Western Europe and Northern Mediterranean the map is filled with huge gaps where nothing ever happens. One thing which I feel is somewhat questionable is how natural barriers like Alps which should provide a solid barrier between North Italy and the rest of Europe doesn't - the Alps are very well connected, and the big gap is in Burgundy for some reason. There are a few small gaps like Burgundy, Northern Netherlands, or middle Balkans, but since they have a lot of settlements on all sides, they are an interesting aspect of campaign strategy. This map is an approximation - it ignores how difficult terrain is (deserts, mountains), how likely it is that there are already roads there and so on.Īlmost the entire Western Europe is fully covered by cities with ton of action. There's also reasonable number of settlements on the entire Northern coast of the Mediterranean - all the way from Cordoba to Marseille to Italy to Greece to Constantinople to Antioch to Jerusalem to Alexandria. Now you can see that parts of the map have plenty of cities - and plenty of action - while others are huge gaps where nothing happens.















Rome total war vs medieval 2 total war